Report No. 28 · July 2026

The Loyalty Penalty

What disengaged UK broadband customers really pay, who pays the most, and why the gap is closing faster than the headlines suggest. Built on 35 cited sources, every figure dated and traced to a named primary source.

By Dr Alex J. Martin-Smith CMgr MBA LLM DBA · Reviewed by Adrian James · BroadbandSwitch.uk

A row of modern red-brick terraced houses on a quiet UK residential street in sunshine.
The loyalty penalty, measured street by street
£7 to £9a month, the gap

Read it your way

The full report is below, section by section, exactly as it appears in print. Prefer paper? Take the PDF.

⇩ Download the 27-page PDF
Page 2 Publication details

About this report

The Loyalty Penalty is an independent research publication from BroadbandSwitch.uk, part of the SearchSwitchSave group. It is prepared to a point-in-time standard: every statistic is attributed to a named, dated source, and the full APA 7th edition reference list at the back lets any reader check any figure. Where official Ofcom data and fresher industry data differ, both are presented with a reconciliation note rather than one being quietly preferred.

Important notices

Point in time. Version 1.1, published July 2026. All data, prices and product details were checked to 17 July 2026 and may change. Verify current details with your provider before acting. All consumer prices in this report include VAT. Next scheduled review: on publication of Ofcom's next Pricing and Consumer Engagement report, expected 2027.

Analysis, not advice. This report is independent analysis of the UK broadband market. It is not financial, legal or contractual advice. Your own best deal depends on your address, your usage and your circumstances, so treat the figures here as a guide to the questions worth asking, not a recommendation to act.

Independence. BroadbandSwitch.uk operates comparison services and may receive commission when readers switch provider through our links. This does not influence the analysis in this report, and no provider has paid for inclusion or seen this document before publication. The social tariff guidance in Section 5 earns us nothing: it is here purely to help households who qualify.

Trade marks. BT, EE, Plusnet, Sky, TalkTalk, Vodafone, Virgin Media O2, Zen, YouFibre and all other company and product names are the trade marks of their respective owners and are used here for identification only. No endorsement is implied in either direction.

Corrections. We correct errors promptly and transparently. Spotted one? Contact the editorial team via broadbandswitch.uk/corrections and we will review, correct and note the change.

Media enquiries. Journalists and editors are welcome to quote from this report with attribution to BroadbandSwitch.uk. For interviews, the underlying data or a press pack, contact press@searchswitchsave.com or visit the media centre at broadbandswitch.uk/media. Our previous reports have been covered by outlets including ISPreview.co.uk.

Publisher. © 2026 BroadbandSwitch.uk, a trading name of SearchSwitchSave (Isle of Man company 030828B · UK IP UK00004211113 · ICO IoM R697728). Registered office: Sycamore House, Glen Duff, Lezayre, IM7 2AT, Isle of Man.

How to cite this report

Suggested attribution: BroadbandSwitch.uk, The Loyalty Penalty (Report No. 28), July 2026, broadbandswitch.uk. Corrections are welcome, answered and published.

Page 3 Foreword

The gap you never agreed to

Most reporting on broadband prices asks whether bills are going up. The more useful question is quieter: who pays more than they need to, simply for staying put, and why.

The loyalty penalty is an unusual consumer harm. It punishes people for doing nothing wrong. You signed a fair deal, you kept paying, and at some point the price a new customer is offered quietly dropped below the price you were left on. Nobody sent you a bill marked "penalty". It simply accrued, a few pounds a month, in the space between the deal you took and the deal you could have.

This report sets out to measure that space honestly. It names the size of the gap, shows exactly who it falls on, and, just as importantly, says clearly where it does not apply. A report that only prosecuted providers would be a weaker one, so Section 8 is given over to the evidence that the market as a whole is competitive and getting cheaper in real terms. Both things are true at once, and the interesting story lives in holding them together.

One finding matters to me more than the rest. There is a discount that already exists, that millions of households on Universal Credit and Pension Credit qualify for, and that around nine in ten of them never claim. We make no money from social tariffs. Section 5 is here for one reason only: to help the people this penalty hits hardest. If this report moves a single family onto a deal they did not know they could have, it will have earned its place.

The loyalty penalty is the rare harm that charges you for loyalty itself. The good news buried in the data is that it is a closing gap, and every household and small business has the power to close it a little faster.
Dr Alex J. Martin-Smith, Founder, BroadbandSwitch.uk
Handwritten signature of Dr Alex J. Martin-Smith

Dr Alex J. Martin-Smith

CMgr MBA LLM DBA · Isle of Man, July 2026 · alexmartinsmith · Reviewed by Adrian James

Page 4 Executive summary

The loyalty penalty, on one page

The gap is real, and it is measurable. Ofcom's latest pricing research finds that out-of-contract customers pay £7 a month more on standalone broadband, £8 more on dual-play and £9 more on triple-play bundles than in-contract customers[27]. That is £84 to £108 a year, rounded. At the end of June 2025, 28% of broadband customers were out of contract for at least one service in their bundle[27], the single biggest predictor of overpaying, though the regulator is careful to say most, not all, of them could save.

It grows with your speed. On dual-play packages the gap runs from £4.17 a month on a standard tier to £7.94 on ultrafast[27], often for the identical line into the identical home. And in the year to July 2025, standalone prices fell 6% on average in real terms across the five speed tiers, for every tier except the slowest, which rose 17%[27].

It falls hardest on those least able to fight it. Just 19% of over-64s switched a communications service last year against 29% of 25 to 44 year olds, and 21% of the poorest households against 27% of the most affluent[27]. Low-income households already pay a poverty premium of around £217 a year across essential markets[8].

The clearest waste is a discount nobody claims. Only 532,000 of roughly 6.2 million eligible households are on a broadband social tariff, a take-up of 8.6%[27], because 70% do not know the tariffs exist[25]. Citizens Advice put the unclaimed support at more than £824 million a year in 2023, and on today's larger eligible base the figure would be higher still[5].

The market is moving the right way. The out-of-contract pool has fallen from 40% in 2019[17], switching is up from 14% to 18%[27], and the providers winning customers fastest are the challenger networks that have stopped raising prices mid-contract at all[13]. The penalty is not a fixed feature of UK broadband. It is a gap that is closing.

£7 to £9
monthly gap, in contract vs out of contract
28%
of broadband customers are out of contract
8.6%
social tariff take-up among eligible households
58%
of micro-firms run on a residential contract
−6%
real-terms fall in standalone prices, yr to Jul 2025
See what you should be paying
Free postcode check across 35+ UK providers. No signup.

The whole report in one sentence

UK broadband is competitive and getting cheaper in real terms, yet a stubborn transfer persists, from the disengaged to the engaged and from the poorer to the better-off, and the fastest way to close it is a contract check, a social-tariff check, and a look at what full fibre now costs in your street.

Page 6 Section 01 · The evidence

01The £7 question

There is a number at the heart of the UK broadband market that sounds like an accusation: 28%. That is the share of broadband customers who, at the end of June 2025, were out of contract for at least one service in their bundle, measured across the largest providers[27]. It is tempting to read that as 28% being overcharged. The truth is more useful, and more precise, than the headline.

Here is the figure that gives this section its name, stated plainly so there is no confusion. Ofcom's Pricing and Consumer Engagement report finds that out-of-contract customers pay £7 a month more for standalone broadband, £8 more for dual-play and £9 more for triple-play bundles than in-contract customers buying the same kind of service[27]. It is not a million-pound question and there is no trick in it. It is simply £7 to £9 a month, which is £84 to £108 a year rounded, sitting in the gap between the deal a new customer is offered and the deal a lapsed customer drifts onto.

The regulator is careful about the very next word, and so are we. It says most out-of-contract customers could save money, not all[28]. Some have already negotiated their price down. Some sit on rolling deals at or below new-customer rates. Some have looked and decided the saving is not worth the effort. Being out of contract is not the same as being overcharged, but it is the single strongest predictor of it.

The difference has narrowed significantly, but it is still the case that most out-of-contract customers could save money by switching or re-contracting.
Ofcom, Pricing and Consumer Engagement report, 2026
i

In short

What out of contract actually means

Your broadband deal has a minimum period, usually 12, 18 or 24 months. Once it ends you are out of contract: your service carries on, but usually at a higher standard price, and you are free to leave, re-contract or switch at any time without an exit fee.

28%of broadband customers are out of contract
£108top of the annual gap, triple-play, rounded
−6%real-terms fall in standalone prices, yr to Jul 2025
2026-07-22T10:05:47.149497 image/svg+xml Matplotlib v3.10.8, https://matplotlib.org/
The loyalty pool is shrinking, but a quarter of customers remain out of contractSource: Ofcom (2020) for the 2019 and 2020 figures (around 8.7 million customers in 2019); Ofcom (2026) for June 2025. UK residential broadband, share out of contract for at least one service in the bundle, largest providers.

The direction of travel matters as much as the level. In 2019, four in ten broadband customers were out of contract[17]. A wave of Ofcom interventions followed: end-of-contract notifications, annual best-tariff reminders and voluntary pricing commitments from the major providers[15][16]. The pool fell to 35% in 2020[17] and 28% by 2025[27]. The market is getting better at nudging people, but tens of millions of pounds still change hands every year on the strength of inertia alone. This report sets out who pays it, how much, why, and what closes the gap.

Page 8 Section 02 · The evidence

02The gap, tier by tier

A single average hides the real story. The loyalty penalty is not one number; it grows with the speed of your connection. The figures below are for dual-play packages, meaning broadband plus a landline on one bill, the most common way UK households buy.

i

In short

Dual-play, and real terms

Dual-play means broadband and a home phone line bought together on one bill; triple-play adds pay TV. Real terms means after stripping out general inflation, so prices can be compared fairly across years.

2026-07-22T10:05:47.188154 image/svg+xml Matplotlib v3.10.8, https://matplotlib.org/
The faster your broadband, the bigger the loyalty penaltySource: Ofcom (2026), Figure 24: dual-play (broadband plus landline) average monthly prices, mid-2025. Prices include VAT.

On a standard sub-30 Mbit/s dual-play package, the gap between the promoted price a new customer pays and the list price a lapsed customer drifts onto is £4.17 a month[27]. Step up to superfast and it widens to £6.84. On an ultrafast package it reaches £7.94 a month, for what is very often the identical line into the identical home[27]. Over a year that is roughly £50, £82 and £95 respectively, rounded: the more you pay for speed, the more staying put tends to cost you.

The pattern is not an accident of one dataset. Ofcom's earlier pricing work found the same shape a year before, with out-of-contract customers on superfast and full-fibre bundles consistently paying the widest premiums[22]. The loyalty penalty, in other words, is concentrated exactly where the market is growing fastest: the higher-speed tiers that more and more households are moving onto. It is not a flat surcharge; it scales with the value of the connection.

The paradox worth knowing

In the year to July 2025, standalone prices fell in real terms for every speed tier except one: the slowest. Sub-30 Mbit/s packages rose 17% in real terms, 22% in cash, on July 2024. The customers on the oldest, slowest copper lines, who are disproportionately older and least likely to switch, are the only group whose prices went the wrong way[27]. We return to them in Section 4.

Page 9 Section 03 · The evidence

03The pounds-and-pence era

For years the loyalty penalty had a silent accomplice: the mid-contract price rise, dressed up as a percentage no one could predict. That era is ending, and 2026 is the hinge.

Until recently, most large providers raised prices every April by a formula: the consumer prices index plus, typically, 3.9%. In a calm year that was a mild irritation. In April 2023, with CPI at 10.5%, it meant increases of 14.4% on bills that customers had been told were fixed[1]. The year before it was 9.3%, the year after 7.9%[1]. The one thing these rises had in common was that you could not know the number when you signed.

From 17 January 2025, Ofcom banned inflation-linked mid-contract rises in all new contracts[21]. Any rise must now be set out in pounds and pence, in cash, before you sign. The Telecoms Consumer Charter agreed in February 2026 confirmed the direction, and April 2026 saw the last round of the old inflation-linked increases work through legacy contracts[10].

2026-07-22T10:05:47.342766 image/svg+xml Matplotlib v3.10.8, https://matplotlib.org/
The unpredictable percentage era, and the shift that ended itSource: BroadbandSwitch.uk (2026) provider price-rise guide, applying published CPI-plus-3.9% terms. Figures for a representative large-provider contract.

So what does the new fixed era actually cost? The table below turns the 2026 pounds-and-pence rises into what they add over a typical two-year contract[1]. A flat £4 a month is £96 across 24 months. And there is a sting the headline rate hides: a £4 rise on a £20 package is a 20% increase, while the same £4 on a £60 package is under 7%. The pounds-and-pence approach is fairer to predict, but it lands hardest on the cheapest packages, and therefore often on the customers with the least to spare. The tracker behind these figures is kept current at broadbandswitch.uk/in-contract-price-rises-2026.

The 2026 fixed mid-contract rises, and what they add over 24 months (pounds-and-pence contracts; start-date conditions vary by provider; legacy inflation-linked contracts saw their final indexed rise in April 2026)
ProviderMonthly riseOver 24 monthsAs % of a £25 bill
BT£4.00£9616%
EE£4.00£9616%
Plusnet£4.00£9616%
TalkTalk£4.00£9616%
Virgin Media£4.00£9616%
Vodafone£3.50£8414%
Sky£3.00£7212%
2026-07-22T10:05:47.293921 image/svg+xml Matplotlib v3.10.8, https://matplotlib.org/
The 2026 mid-contract rises, now in pounds, not percentagesSource: provider announcements collated in BroadbandSwitch.uk (2026); fixed monthly increases applied in 2026 to contracts on pounds-and-pence terms. Dotted line: simple average of the seven rises shown, £3.79 a month (derived). Start-date conditions vary by provider.

The most interesting development is at the other end of the market. A growing group of providers now promises no mid-contract rises at all. Zen holds your price for the life of the contract[35], YouFibre makes no-surprise pricing an explicit promise[34], and Rebel and other challengers have made price certainty their calling card[13]. This is not a footnote. As Section 7 shows, the providers winning customers fastest are, to a striking degree, the ones that have stopped raising prices mid-contract at all. Price certainty has become a competitive weapon. One honest caveat holds throughout, though: a fixed price removes the nasty surprise, but it is not automatically the lowest price. The test is the same as ever, which is the total you will pay across the whole term, including any rise, checked against what a new deal at your address would cost today.

Close-up of a broadband bill with a yellow highlighter marking a monthly price that has increased.

A worked example: what re-contracting actually saves

Suppose you are out of contract on a superfast dual-play deal at the £38.48 list average and you re-contract at the £31.64 in-contract average. You save £6.84 a month. If your new deal carries a stated £3 rise the following April, you pay the lower price until then and £34.64 after it, still below where you started. Illustrative and derived from the Ofcom averages above; your own prices will differ.

Page 12 Section 04 · The evidence

04The people who pay most

If the loyalty penalty were spread evenly it would be an annoyance. It is not. It concentrates on the customers with the least time, confidence and money to fight it, which is what turns a pricing quirk into a fairness problem.

2026-07-22T10:05:47.485569 image/svg+xml Matplotlib v3.10.8, https://matplotlib.org/
Switching is a younger, more comfortable habitSource: Ofcom (2026), switching-tracker data. Share switching any communications service in the past 12 months. Social grades follow the NRS system: AB covers managerial and professional households, DE covers semi-skilled and unskilled workers and those reliant on the state.
An older couple at home reading household bills together beside an open laptop.
Older customers are the least likely to switch, and the most likely to be paying the penalty.

Ofcom's engagement data is stark. In the past year, 29% of 25 to 44 year olds switched a communications service against just 19% of the over-64s[27]. By social grade, 27% of the most affluent AB households switched against 21% of the poorest DE households[27]. The pattern is not a neat gradient, since skilled manual C2 households were the most active of all at 29%, but the DE group is clearly the least engaged[27]. Longevity compounds it: 43% of broadband customers have been with the same provider for more than five years, on Ofcom's own switching-tracker data[33], and older customers are consistently the group least likely to have moved at all[14]. The people most exposed to the penalty are the least likely to act on it, and the least confident comparing deals in the first place.

There is a hard financial edge to this. Research by the University of Bristol and Fair By Design found that low-income households pay a poverty premium averaging £217 a year across essential markets (median £182), simply for being poor, through pricier tariffs, payment methods and lost switching gains; the researchers flag the 2022 figure as artificially low given energy market conditions that year[8]. Broadband is woven through that premium[11]. And Ofcom's own history shows the direction of harm: vulnerable out-of-contract broadband customers were overpaying £4.40 a month each in 2019, a figure the regulator's interventions cut to £2.30 by 2020[17]. Real progress, but not a solved problem, and Citizens Advice estimates around 3.9 million broadband bill payers in Great Britain are struggling to afford their bills, a figure it derives by applying a 13.1% rate to the bill-paying population[6], a strain Ofcom's own affordability tracking continues to record[23].

19%of over-64s switched a comms service last year, vs 29% of 25 to 44s
£217average annual poverty premium for low-income households
3.9mGB bill payers struggling to afford broadband (est.)

Two older benchmarks, treated strictly as context

Citizens Advice’s 2018 super-complaint put the loyalty penalty at around £877 a year, but across five essential markets, not broadband alone[4]. Separately, its 2017 broadband-only estimate was around £113 for every year a customer stays beyond their initial term[3]. Both predate the reforms in this report, so we cite them as history, not as current broadband totals. The principle they capture, though, has not changed.

Page 14 Section 05 · The evidence

05The £824m no one is claiming

There is one part of the loyalty penalty that is not about switching at all. It is about a discount that already exists, that millions qualify for, and that almost nobody takes. It is the clearest waste in the whole market.

Broadband social tariffs are cut-price packages, typically £12.50 to £20 a month, for households on Universal Credit, Pension Credit and other qualifying benefits. They save an eligible household around £200 a year, and Ofcom has pressed providers to promote them since 2022[20]. In June 2025, just 532,000 households were on one. That is 8.6% of the roughly 6.2 million eligible[27]. The other nine in ten are, in effect, paying a loyalty penalty they do not even know they could avoid.

The reason is not price. It is awareness. In Ofcom research, 70% of eligible households did not know social tariffs existed as of October 2025[25]. Citizens Advice put the unclaimed support at more than £824 million a year in December 2023, calculated as roughly 95% of the then 4.3 million eligible households missing a saving of about £200 each[5]. On the 2025 base of 6.2 million, the same sum exceeds £1.1 billion (derived). And there is a quiet paradox in the numbers: the count of households on a social tariff keeps rising, yet the share of eligible households it represents has fallen, because Universal Credit has grown even faster[30]. The safety net is expanding more slowly than the need.

2026-07-22T10:05:47.236022 image/svg+xml Matplotlib v3.10.8, https://matplotlib.org/
The gap between who qualifies for a social tariff and who takes oneSource: Ofcom social tariff take-up series (2022 to 2026); eligibility based on the Universal Credit caseload. UK. Take-up counts connections, which is close to, but not identical to, households.
A person at a kitchen table going through household letters beside an open laptop.
Ten minutes at the kitchen table: the check that nine in ten eligible households never make.
Social tariff take-up against the eligible population
DateOn a social tariffEligible householdsTake-up
February 202255,0004.2m1.3%
April 2023220,0004.3m5.1%
June 2024506,0005.3m9.6%
June 2025532,0006.2m8.6%

One provider is missing

BT carries roughly two thirds of all broadband social tariff connections and Sky about a quarter[27]. Among the major providers, TalkTalk remains the notable exception with no standard social tariff, a gap worth watching as scrutiny of affordability grows.

Take action

If you receive Universal Credit, Pension Credit or similar, check this first

A social tariff is the single biggest saving in this report, and around nine in ten eligible households are missing it. It is not a charity handout: it is a discounted package you qualify for. Ask your provider by name whether they offer one, or see every provider’s current offer in our social tariffs guide. We earn nothing from this. It is simply the right thing to check.

Page 16 Section 06 · The evidence

06The small business blind spot

Almost every figure in the loyalty penalty debate is about households. That leaves the country’s 5.6 million small businesses in a data blind spot, and many of them in a protection gap they do not know exists.

Here is the finding that should give regulators pause. According to Ofcom's most recent dedicated study of small business connectivity, published in 2022, 58% of micro-firms, those with one to nine staff, run their internet on a residential contract rather than a business one[19]. They do it because it looks cheaper and simpler. But in doing so they can fall between two stools: they miss the service guarantees and support a business contract carries, while the consumer protections built around households were not designed with a business in mind.

There are 5.64 million small businesses in the UK, some 99% of the business population[9], and connectivity has long been one of their most common friction points, with the Federation of Small Businesses documenting persistent gaps in speed, reliability and value for smaller firms[12]. A residential line bought to save a few pounds can quietly become the most expensive one a business runs, precisely because nobody reviews it. Our guide to home versus business broadband for small companies weighs the trade-offs in detail.

2026-07-22T10:05:47.524914 image/svg+xml Matplotlib v3.10.8, https://matplotlib.org/
Most micro-businesses run on residential broadband contractsSource: Ofcom (2022), SME experience research. Share of micro-SMEs (1 to 9 employees) by contract type; the remainder have no contract or don't know.

The protection picture is genuinely mixed. End-of-contract and best-tariff notifications do reach the smallest business customers, those with ten or fewer staff, though in a looser form than households receive[16]. But One Touch Switch, the single-request way to change provider, launched as a residential service, and its business version was still in trials in mid-2026[31], so a micro-firm wanting to leave has faced more friction than the household next door. And there is a deeper gap still: no UK source publishes average business broadband spend by firm size, or a business out-of-contract share. That absence is itself a finding. Measured only for households, the bill small firms quietly pay is invisible by design, and it deserves its own data series.

Page 17 Section 07 · The evidence

07Who’s winning

If you want to know whether the loyalty penalty is finally being competed away, follow the customers. In 2025 they moved in one direction with unusual clarity, and it tells you exactly what people will switch for.

i

In short

What an altnet is

An altnet, short for alternative network, is a newer provider building and running its own full fibre lines in competition with the big established networks, Openreach and Virgin Media O2.

2026-07-22T10:05:47.390278 image/svg+xml Matplotlib v3.10.8, https://matplotlib.org/
The great migration: altnet gains almost exactly mirror Openreach's lossesSource: INCA / Point Topic (2026); BT Group and Virgin Media O2 results. Net customer movement, thousands, 2025.

Across 2025, the alternative networks, the challenger providers building their own full fibre, added around 850,000 broadband customers[13]. Over almost exactly the same period, the Openreach network that BT's rivals also rent lost around 860,000 lines[2], and Virgin Media O2 shed 138,400 broadband customers of its own on a net basis[32]. The symmetry is the story. Where consumers finally have a real choice of infrastructure, they are taking it.

Why does this belong in a report about loyalty? Because of what these networks compete on. The challengers have, as a group, led the market on price certainty, largely refusing the inflation-linked mid-contract rises that the incumbents leaned on for years[13]. They dominate customer satisfaction rankings. The lesson for the whole market is that the antidote to a loyalty penalty is not just easier switching; it is giving people something worth staying for.

Switching itself is ticking up, from 14% of broadband customers in 2023 to 18% in 2025[27], helped by One Touch Switch passing three million completed moves by 15 June 2026[31]. The market is getting more fluid. But 18% switching in a year still means the other four in five stayed, and as Section 1 showed, many of them are paying for the privilege. The loyalty penalty has even reached the courts: in November 2025 the Competition Appeal Tribunal certified collective claims against the four largest mobile networks, alleging customers who stayed past their minimum term were left on penalised prices; the scope was narrowed at certification, the operators deny the claims, and it concerns mobile rather than broadband, but it shows how seriously loyalty pricing is now treated[7].

A fibre engineer working inside a street cabinet filled with spools of orange fibre cable on a residential road.
The build-out behind the switch: challenger networks added around 850,000 customers in 2025.
Page 19 Section 08 · The evidence

08Is it fair? What drives the price

A report that only prosecuted the providers would be a weaker one. To be trusted on where loyal customers lose, it has to be straight about where they do not, and about what actually sits behind a broadband bill.

Start with the counter-evidence. Despite the headline rises, average revenue per user (ARPU), the average monthly amount a provider collects per customer, is falling at the biggest firms, not climbing. BT's consumer broadband ARPU was £41.80 in the quarter to December 2025, down 1% on the year[2], and Virgin Media O2 reported declining consumer fixed revenue across 2025[32]. These are not the numbers of companies fattening margins on the backs of loyal customers. They are the numbers of a market under real competitive pressure, exactly as Section 7 would predict.

Behind the retail price sits a wholesale one. The rental every provider pays to run a line into your home is regulated by Ofcom, which has deliberately held the entry-level fibre charge flat in real terms to keep bills down while still letting networks recover the huge cost of building fibre[18][29]. Some of what customers pay is genuine cost: civil works, energy, wages, and the tens of billions being spent to wire the country for fibre.

Standalone prices fell 6% on average in real terms in the year to July 2025. An engaged customer who re-contracts at the end of each deal can hold their real spending flat, or falling, year after year.
The Loyalty Penalty analysis of Ofcom data, 2026

So the fair verdict is a split one. The market as a whole is competitive and getting cheaper in real terms[27]. Providers are not, in aggregate, growing fat on loyalty. But within that healthy average sits a stubborn transfer, from the disengaged to the engaged, from the older to the younger, from the poorer to the better-off. That is the penalty this report measures, and it persists precisely because it is invisible on any single bill.

The counterfactual we could not find

Providers argue a waterbed effect: press prices down in one place, the idea goes, and they rise somewhere else, so new-customer discounts are partly funded by out-of-contract customers, and abolishing the penalty could raise headline prices. It is a reasonable argument, but no UK regulator has published a number that proves or disproves it. We flag it as a genuine open question rather than settle it with a figure we cannot source.

Page 20 Section 09 · The evidence

09What to do about it

The loyalty penalty is unusual among consumer harms: for most people it can be undone in the time it takes to make a cup of tea. Here is where the data points.

If you are a household

Find out when your contract ends; your provider must tell you, and the notification often carries their best available price[16]. If you are past your minimum term, you are in the group most likely to be overpaying, so treat that as a prompt to act. If anyone in your household receives Universal Credit or similar support, check a social tariff before anything else: it is the single biggest saving in this report and nine in ten eligible households are missing it[25]. And if you are on an old sub-30 Mbit/s package, check what full fibre now costs in your street: it reached 82% of UK homes by January 2026[26], and it is often the same price or less for many times the speed.

If you run a small business

Check whether you are on a residential or a business contract, and whether that is actually the right call for your protections as well as your price[19]. Watch for the arrival of business One Touch Switch in 2026, which should make leaving a poor deal far easier than it has been[31].

Where you live changes the picture too. Northern Ireland's early fibre build put availability at 95% of homes with take-up at 62% by July 2025, while Scotland trailed at 71% availability; England and Wales sat between, at 79% and 78% available but with only 41% and 49% taken up[24]. In much of the UK the fast, competitively priced line is already in the street. The gap is the decision to use it.

If you are a policymaker or provider

Three gaps in the public data stand out, and closing them would sharpen everyone's understanding: a published measure of the business loyalty penalty; clearer, directional switching data so we can see who is really gaining and losing; and a settled answer on the waterbed question. On social tariffs, the evidence is overwhelming that the barrier is awareness, not eligibility or price[25]. That is a marketing and signposting problem before it is a regulatory one, and it is eminently fixable.

Three households, worked through

The long-standing copper customer

Out of contract on a standard dual-play deal at the £34.99 list average. Re-contracting at the £30.82 in-contract average saves £4.17 a month, and moving to full fibre may cost no more.

~£50 a year
The Universal Credit household

Paying a typical market price while eligible for a social tariff at £12.50 to £20 a month. The social tariff check comes before any switching decision.

~£200 a year
The micro-firm on a residential deal

Out of contract on an ultrafast package at the £51.88 list average. Re-contracting at the £43.94 average saves £7.94 a month, before even weighing a proper business product.

~£95 a year

Illustrative examples, derived from the Ofcom averages and social tariff prices cited in Sections 2 and 5. Individual prices vary by address and provider.

The antidote to a loyalty penalty is not just easier switching. It is giving people a deal, and a level of certainty, worth staying for.
The Loyalty Penalty, Report No. 28

The good news threaded through this report is that the market is moving the right way. The out-of-contract pool is shrinking, real prices are falling, switching is rising, and the providers competing hardest are the ones offering price certainty rather than mid-contract surprises. The loyalty penalty is not a fixed feature of UK broadband. It is a closing gap, and every household and small business has the power to close it a little faster.

Take action

Two minutes, one postcode

See what full fibre and digital deals reach your address, with real prices, at broadbandswitch.uk. It is the same free checker used by thousands of UK households every week, and it is the fastest way to find out whether your loyalty is costing you. Not sure what speed you actually need? Our free speed test answers that in thirty seconds.

Page 22 Quick answers

Eight common questions

The whole report, answered the way people actually ask. Every answer is sourced, and each links to a free guide if you want the detail.

1Am I overpaying for my broadband?

If you are past your minimum term, quite possibly. At the end of June 2025, 28% of broadband customers were out of contract for at least one service, and Ofcom finds most of that group could save by switching or re-contracting[27]. Start with your contract end date, which your provider must tell you[16].

2What does out of contract actually mean?

Your minimum period, usually 12, 18 or 24 months, has ended. The service carries on, normally at a higher standard price, and you are free to leave, switch or agree a new deal at any time without an exit fee.

3Will switching cut off my internet?

Under One Touch Switch you contact only the new provider, which manages the whole move and tells your old provider. The system had completed three million switches by 15 June 2026[31].

4What is a social tariff, and am I eligible?

A discounted package, typically £12.50 to £20 a month, for households claiming Universal Credit, Pension Credit and certain other benefits, saving around £200 a year[27]. See our social tariffs guide.

5Can my price rise mid-contract?

For contracts signed since 17 January 2025, any rise must be set out in pounds and pence before you sign[21]. Legacy inflation-linked contracts saw their final indexed rise in April 2026[10]. Your own terms are the final word, so check them.

6Is switching worth the hassle?

On the averages in Section 2, closing the gap is worth roughly £50 to £95 a year depending on your speed tier[27], and full fibre reached 82% of UK homes by January 2026[26], so many households can go faster for the same money or less.

7Does this report cover business broadband?

Mostly households, but Section 6 covers the smallest firms: 58% of micro-businesses run on residential contracts[19], and a business version of One Touch Switch was still in trials in mid-2026[31]. More at our business hub.

8Where does the data come from?

Named primary sources only: Ofcom, government statistics, audited company results and named research bodies, each graded in the appendix and listed at the back. Our methodology and public corrections log are online.

Take action

Still not sure? Check your own address in two minutes

Put your postcode into broadbandswitch.uk and see the real prices available where you live, across 35+ providers. Free, no signup, and the fastest way to find out whether your loyalty is costing you.

Page 23 Reference

The acronym and jargon decoder

Every abbreviation and term of art in this report, translated once and properly. Telecoms loves its alphabet; nobody should have to keep up.

ABTNAnnual Best Tariff Notification. The yearly reminder of your provider's cheapest available deal
AltnetAlternative network. A challenger provider building and running its own full-fibre network
ARPUAverage Revenue Per User. What a provider earns per customer on average, a gauge of pricing power
CATCompetition Appeal Tribunal. The specialist court hearing collective consumer claims
CPIConsumer Prices Index. The main official measure of inflation
Dual-playBundle type. Broadband plus a home phone line on one bill; triple-play adds pay TV
ECNEnd-of-Contract Notification. The alert telling you your minimum term is ending
FTTCFibre To The Cabinet. Fibre to the street cabinet, copper for the last stretch to the home
FTTPFibre To The Premises. Full fibre, all the way into the building
LLU / MPFLocal Loop Unbundling / Metallic Path Facility. Rival-run lines using their own exchange equipment
OfcomOffice of Communications. The UK communications regulator
OOCOut of contract. Past your minimum term and free to leave, the group most likely to overpay
OTSOne Touch Switch. Change provider by contacting only the new one
Real termsInflation-adjusted. After stripping out general inflation, so prices compare fairly across years
RPIRetail Prices Index. An older, usually higher, inflation measure
SMESmall and medium-sized enterprise. Here, chiefly micro-firms of one to nine staff
SOGEASingle Order Generic Ethernet Access. Broadband on a copper line with no separate phone service
TOTSCoThe One Touch Switching Company. The industry body that runs the switching hub
UCUniversal Credit. The main working-age benefit, and a common gateway to a social tariff
WFTMRWholesale Fixed Telecoms Market Review. Ofcom's rules governing the wholesale price of lines

Missing a term?

The full living glossary, kept current beyond this report’s print date, is at broadbandswitch.uk.

Page 24 Appendix · Method

How we sourced every figure

This report names a source and a date for every number, but they do not all carry equal weight, so each key figure sits in one of the four grades below. The rule has been the same throughout: where a claim rests on a single party’s word, or is a calculation of ours, we say so plainly rather than dress it as settled fact.

GradeWhat it meansExamples in this report
ConfirmedTraced to a named primary source: Ofcom, a government statistic, or audited company resultsThe £7 to £9 monthly gap; the tier gaps; the 28% out-of-contract share (all Ofcom, 2026)
CorroboratedConsistent across two or more independent sources on different datesThe 850,000 altnet gain against Openreach's loss (INCA; BT); the falling ARPU figures
Single-sourceRests on one organisation's statement, and is flagged as such in the textThe £824m unclaimed support (Citizens Advice); the 70% unaware figure (Ofcom)
DerivedA calculation, shown with its workings so it can be checkedThe 24-month cost of a fixed rise; the annual value of each tier gap; the £1.1bn current-basis social tariff estimate; the three worked household examples

Caveats worth stating plainly

Being out of contract is not the same as overpaying: 28% out of contract does not mean 28% are being overcharged, only that they are the group most likely to be[27]. Reporting periods differ across figures and are stated beside each one. Ofcom's real-terms price falls can coexist with cash increases on individual bills, so both are presented where possible. The Citizens Advice £877 figure spans five essential markets and is not a broadband-only number[4]. The poverty premium research does not isolate a standalone broadband line and reports a mean of £217 against a median of £182, so it is cited as context[8]. The £824 million unclaimed-support figure is a December 2023 Citizens Advice estimate on a 4.3 million eligibility base; our £1.1 billion restatement on the 2025 base is labelled derived[5]. The 3.9 million affordability figure is a Citizens Advice estimate for Great Britain bill payers, derived by applying a 13.1% rate to the bill-paying population, and is graded single-source[6]. Switching rates by social grade are not a linear gradient: C2 households switch more than AB, so we report the AB and DE figures with that caveat attached[27]. An earlier draft claim that most older customers have never switched was removed at fact-check because no current primary source supports it at that strength. A current Virgin Media O2 fixed ARPU figure could not be verified to a primary source, so it is omitted rather than estimated. Coverage snapshots are dated in each caption because availability moves quarterly. Comparison-site figures were excluded as primary sources. Where an aggregate is our own calculation, it is labelled derived, not attributed to a regulator.

Why grade our own numbers?

Because the fastest way to lose a reader’s trust is to present a guess as a fact. Telling you how firm each number is, and showing the sums behind the soft ones, is the discipline that runs through this entire report and every report before it.

Page 25 References

References (APA 7th)

Numbered and sorted alphabetically by author. All URLs verified 17 July 2026. Where official and industry data differ, both appear in the text with dates and scope.

[1]BroadbandSwitch.uk. (2026). UK in-contract broadband price rises 2026: A provider-by-provider guide. BroadbandSwitch.uk. https://broadbandswitch.uk/in-contract-price-rises-2026.html
[2]BT Group. (2026). Third quarter and nine-month results to 31 December 2025. BT Group plc. https://newsroom.bt.com/
[3]Citizens Advice. (2017). Exploring the loyalty penalty in the broadband market. Citizens Advice. https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/policy/publications/exploring-the-loyalty-penalty-in-the-broadband-market/
[4]Citizens Advice. (2018). Citizens Advice issues super-complaint as loyal customers continue to be penalised by over £4 billion a year. Citizens Advice. https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/about-us/media-centre/press-releases/
[5]Citizens Advice. (2023). Citizens Advice responds to Ofcom’s latest figures on take-up of social tariffs. Citizens Advice. https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/about-us/media-centre/press-releases/
[6]Citizens Advice. (2026). Broadband and the cost of living: Households behind on bills [Yonder polling for Citizens Advice]. Citizens Advice. https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/
[7]Competition Appeal Tribunal. (2025). Justin Gutmann v Vodafone, EE, Three and O2: Collective proceedings orders granted 14 November 2025 ([2025] CAT 77). Competition Appeal Tribunal. https://www.catribunal.org.uk/
[8]Davies, S., & Evans, J. (2023). The poverty premium in 2022: Progress and problems. University of Bristol Personal Finance Research Centre & Fair By Design. https://www.bristol.ac.uk/geography/research/pfrc/
[9]Department for Business and Trade. (2025). Business population estimates for the UK and regions 2025. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/business-population-estimates-2025
[10]Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. (2026). Telecoms Consumer Charter. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/telecoms-consumer-charter
[11]Fair By Design. (n.d.). Understanding the poverty premium. Fair By Design. Retrieved July 2026, from https://fairbydesign.com/poverty-premium/
[12]Federation of Small Businesses. (2019). Lost connectivity: Why small firms need action on broadband and mobile. FSB. https://www.fsb.org.uk/
[13]Independent Networks Cooperative Association & Point Topic. (2026). State of the altnets 2026. INCA. https://www.inca.coop/
[14]Ofcom. (2019). Access and inclusion report 2018. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/
[15]Ofcom. (2020). Companies must tell customers about their best deals. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/service-quality/companies-must-tell-customers-about-their-best-deals
[16]Ofcom. (2020). Helping consumers get better deals: A review of end-of-contract notifications and annual best-tariff notifications. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/service-quality/helping-consumers-get-better-deals
[17]Ofcom. (2020). Broadband customers to save millions as pricing commitments take effect. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/saving-money/telecoms-customers-saving-millions
[18]Ofcom. (2021). Wholesale fixed telecoms market review 2021 to 2026. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/
[19]Ofcom. (2022). SME consumer experience in the communications market. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/
[20]Ofcom. (2022). Broadband and phone firms must promote cheaper deals for struggling customers. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/
[21]Ofcom. (2024). Ofcom to ban inflation-linked mid-contract price rises. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/bills-and-charges/ban-on-inflation-linked-mid-contract-price-rise
[22]Ofcom. (2024). Pricing trends for communications services in the UK 2024. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/research-and-data/multi-sector/pricing/2024/pricing-trends-for-communications-services-in-the-uk-2024.pdf
[23]Ofcom. (2025). Communications affordability tracker. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/saving-money/affordability-tracker
[24]Ofcom. (2025). Connected nations UK report 2025. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/coverage-and-speeds/connected-nations-20252
[25]Ofcom. (2025). Half of low-income households in the dark over broadband social tariffs. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/saving-money/half-of-low-income-households-in-dark-over-broadband-social-tariffs
[26]Ofcom. (2026). Connected nations spring 2026 update. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/coverage-and-speeds/
[27]Ofcom. (2026). Pricing and consumer engagement: Trends in the UK communications sector. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/research-and-data/multi-sector/pricing/2025/pricing-and-consumer-engagement-report.pdf
[28]Ofcom. (2026). New Ofcom research reveals how to cut phone and internet bills [Press release]. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/bills-and-charges/new-ofcom-research-reveals-how-to-cut-phone-and-internet-bills
[29]Ofcom. (2026). Promoting competition and investment in fibre networks: Telecoms access review 2026 to 2031. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/
[30]Point Topic. (2025). UK broadband affordability and the elusive social tariffs: May 2025 update. Point Topic. https://www.point-topic.com/post/uk-broadband-affordability-2025
[31]TOTSCo. (2026). One Touch Switch performance and milestones: Three million completed switches. The One Touch Switching Company. https://totsco.org.uk/
[32]Virgin Media O2. (2026). Q4 and full year 2025 results. Virgin Media O2 / Liberty Global. https://www.virginmediao2.co.uk/
[33]Which?. (2023). Broadband customer loyalty and switching [Analysis of Ofcom switching-tracker data]. Which?. https://www.which.co.uk/
[34]YouFibre. (n.d.). Our promises: No surprise price rises. YouFibre. Retrieved July 2026, from https://support.youfibre.com/knowledge-base/article/no-surprise-price-rises/
[35]Zen Internet. (n.d.). Contract price promise. Zen Internet. Retrieved July 2026, from https://www.zen.co.uk/
Page 26 The library

Read the previous reports

Every BroadbandSwitch.uk report and guide is free, independently produced and fully sourced. Pull one off the shelf.

★ Featured in the press. The Last Dial Tone (Report No. 26) was picked up and published by ISPreview.co.uk, one of the UK’s leading broadband news outlets, which called it “one of the better overarching summaries” of the switch-off.

The next one

Report No. 29 is already in the diary. Every report is announced first at the reports hub, and each one is built to be better than the last.

Page 27 About

The author, and the promise

Portrait photograph of Dr Alex J. Martin-Smith.

Dr Alex J. Martin-Smith CMgr MBA LLM DBA

Alex is the founder of BroadbandSwitch.uk and the SearchSwitchSave network of UK comparison and digital tools. His work sits at the junction of consumer telecoms, regulation and clear explanation. His doctoral research in organisational capability underpins the analytical method running through this report, and his standing rule for everything the network publishes is the one applied here: every figure dated, every source named, nothing guessed.

Connect: linkedin.com/in/alexmartinsmith · Reviewed by Adrian James, Sales Director and Broadband Editor, BroadbandSwitch.uk. Every figure in this report was checked against its named source by both author and reviewer before publication.

Author pages: broadbandswitch.uk/alex-martin-smith · broadbandswitch.uk/adrian-james

About BroadbandSwitch.uk. An independent UK broadband comparison service: postcode-level availability checking across dozens of live providers, a free speed test, clear guides, and a verified market directory tracking 429 UK ISPs. The service earns commission when readers switch through its links; analysis and rankings are never sold, and this report was produced without provider involvement or sight before publication.

The promise. Every report we publish is held to the same standard, and every one is built to be better than the last. The figures here are dated, the sources named, and the soft numbers flagged. If you find an error, tell us: we correct promptly, transparently, and in public. Authority is not a claim. It is a habit, kept in the open.

Take action

One postcode. Two minutes. Every option we compare, at your address.

broadbandswitch.uk · The Loyalty Penalty, Report No. 28 · July 2026